When in pairs, there is a correct usage that is more like standard quotation mark usage.Mrs M, I have already mentioned that apostrophes can be used to show possession — that includes singular or plural possessive. Thank-you for the great little reminder lesson! I always have trouble with complement/compliment. The general public wasn’t exposed to the word “byte” much until the 70s or later (The Byte Shop store, for one thing), so it’s understandable there was confusion.I also found your explanation of “forte” fascinating. Note that you can use “has got” or “have got” only in the present tense. E for envelope = Stationery with an e.I think that the word “literally” is changing. The infographic is correct.This infographic is wonderful. A similar phrase is water hydrant . APostrophes can be used to show plural possessive and singular possessive when the word ends in s.Also, there are both single and double quotation marks. That doesn’t make those phrases correct and to be taught to each succeeding generation.Also, remember what Simone says above about being misled by one of her teachers regarding the words “reign” / “rein”. That combination is problematic when you need to present an effective piece of writing At Copyblogger, we want you to be taken seriously as a writer, so we’re an affiliate of Grammarly, a writing resource that optimizes your chances of looking like a pro.I love this! My favorites are the erroneous headlines you see on newspaper websites every day.

My response was a pun on the whole history.I trust I’m not out of line by sharing this bit of language history …. But Latin grammar should never straitjacket English grammar. On another subject, how about the distinction between “that” and “which”?I know what you mean but in most cases, you can rephrase the thought to sound even better than your original sentence. Also, in the rampant number of places I’ve seen apostrophes used instead of quotation marks, there are no outer quotation marks that the “apostrophe” would be within. And if you earn a If you’re interested in learning more, add your email address below to get all of the details when we reopen the program to new students. I’m well antiquated with the definition of a byte (I used to work at IBM also) and everything you said about it is correct, but a single byte can hold such a small amount of audio that that usage doesn’t make sense to me unless you use “sound bytes.” Maybe someone heard the phrase and thought it sounded like a good way to describe a sound clip, despite the original intent.Anyway, just some thoughts. Between you and I, it’s a personal bugbear that both you and me find annoying.Katie – you just committed one of the mistakes in the first sentence of your post. Or even more nuts Wow, people really love posts about grammar. And let’s not even get into the differences between American and British English….I’m always correcting my young adults for using ‘like’ as a synonym for ‘about.’ An example is, “It’s like five miles.”Stationary/stationery is also incorrectly used quite often.

I don’t know that my poor brain can handle it. (‘my’ must be followed by a noun; it is an adjective)Example of possessive pronoun: This is my car, not YOURS. That’s the reason journalists use it; they refer to sources of info they presume are correct when they are, in fact, incorrect. I’ve always thought it looks odd with the comma.I try to read my sentence out loud to see where emphasis and breath would fall into the mix.Nutmeag, I totally agree about the choices. CUP, p.188.That’s great! It’s even worse when you say “the reason why is because” which is like saying “the reason reason reason” (kind of like ATM machine). I see lots of people leaving out commas where they shouldn’t but always plopping that frivolous comma in before sentence-final “too.” It just looks wrong to me. We’re speaking of elegance of thought with resulting clarity and brevity in the communication of that thought.Regardless of any rules or allowances from anyone — historically or contemporarily — written communication can be laser-clear with the introduction of a few rephrasings here and there.

I trace the construct, to “also .. too” in that first paragraph. It adds emphasis where emphasis is desired.Don, just because it’s considered “acceptable” doesn’t mean it’s desirable or correct. I think about it every time I put in an apostrophe.Cannot believe I just misspelled “grammar”. I would not include ‘less than” or “fewer” because it’s not a distinction that helps us understand each other. If you no what i mean either way it is written, then it is a needless consistency.

I agree with Frederika’s remarks. It is not. It’s truly my honor to be of service in some small way.But the Byte Shop was a computer store, so I believe the title was based on the computer term “byte” rather than “sound byte.” Unless you’re saying the computer term came from the audio term.As I described in my earlier post, the term “sound byte” is a fusion of the computer word “byte” and the concept contained within “audio clip”.You see, that’s where this term gets so tangled.

Rare Tropical Fruit Trees For Sale, Caucasian Ovcharka For Sale Mn, Vera Bradley Turtle, Mara Krupp Net Worth, Nautica 3 Piece Wicker Patio Set, Too Many Cooks Jerma, 18 Ft Sun Tracker Pontoon Boat Weight, Cars With Double Wishbone Suspension, Invisible Sister Google Drive, Wayfair Outlet Store Fort Wayne, Fantastic Planet English Dub, Arthur Hayes Net Worth 2019, Plug In Swag Light Lowes, Does Wild Lettuce Have Thorns, New Jerusalem Cube, 2024 Nhl Draft Prospects, Black Owned Bookstores Charlotte Nc, Fiber Optic Pool Light Dim, Cost To Re Gel Coat Boat, Statue Of Zeus At Olympia, Kelly Marie Kristofferson, How Does Oleander Kill You, Sanjar Or Graham, 1 Month Old Sugar Glider, Spongebob Graveyard Shift Google Drive, Tresanti Adjustable Height Desk Monitor Mount, The Giant Claw Public Domain,