9th edition provided a couple of great little upgrades for this humble Battlesuit. Tau are going to be struggling to to effectively score primary points, so they can’t be cutting off tools that might allow them to do so as a trivial measure.I’d say shield drones are more like cultists than the other units. While I don’t like power creep, the opposite isn’t better.If a game mechanic like Drones-taking-wounds is (allegedly) at the heart of the problem, as people similarly argued with Ynnari and Broviathan, it needs to change. Moreover, the way in which these units interact with friendly models is entirely different, as is their offensive output and their defensive capabilities.Put simply, T’au Pathfinders and Aeldari Rangers are different, and points changes could reflect this difference.However, a blunt approach to this endeavor might be the most appropriate given the circumstances. Download Tau Codex 8th.pdf.

Why would the designers spend a significant amount of time assessing new points costs when a whole new codex might be just around the corner?But to play devil’s advocate, players might be waiting a good few months for their 9th edition codex, and in the meantime they’ll be playing with points costs that aren’t quite right given the context of the new edition.This is a reasonable argument, but between the two options — spend more time on a detailed, comprehensive points update or spend less time on a broad, imperfect update — I would choose the latter. Vast improvement over the last Tau one. GW needs to sell new models and new codex books to stay in business, and I think it would be prudent for their staff to spend more time on products to be released soon than products that have already been released and will be updated regardless.But let’s have a look a some practical example of the updates. Then of course there’s the issue of what to arm them with.If I had to guess, I‘d wager Riptides go and Commanders stay just to Farm those juicy While We Stand We Fight points.Also don’t get why people are so in arms about Drones? But it obviously had implications on what armies were good/bad.Eg.g. This is a cassette that will play in you even other to dated thing. 9th edition represents a significant change to the game. Consider the amount of time and effort that the designers would have to put in in order to accurately update each and every unit in the game. it made Ynnari in the ITC a lot better then they were in the game “played RAW”, where fire-&-fading Reapers/Spears couldn’t hide, and it made Tau a lot weaker.Ultimately, the game needs to be fixed at the “RAW”-level, not at the level of various house-rules and adapted variants of 40K, and at that level, Tau have been far more problematic than any Ynnari, Castellan or similar “ITC-meta”lists have ever been.If anything, the entire ITC circuit having to come up with a house-made variant to sidestep the most egregiously OP army in all of 8th Edition just proves that point.If you build a list around spamming grots, cultists, or shield drones, you’re upset. The Ghostkeel takes the Infiltrator keyword, meaning that in can deploy anywhere on the board that is outside of the opponent’s deployment zone and more than 12″ from an enemy model.And while the Ghostkeel doesn’t offer the pure offensive punch to take an opponent off an objective, it does provide enough speed and resilience to take a mid-board objective in the early stages of the game. I think GW need to seriously reconsider how they write the Tau codex and fluff if they want them to be a viable army going forward.But as with Ynnari, I think it’s worth removing the toxic play experience first.If they get around to making the army viable in some form later, great.I don’t think Tau Drones are even _close_ to as toxic as Ynnari are. The ability to fall back and shoot was one of the Commander’s key assets, and now that it’s gone, T’au players are going to have to carefully consider our HQ choices as we build lists.With the latest points changes, taking just one Commander in place of the usual three would free up roughly 300 points from our armies, which is certainly nothing to sniff at. In 9th edition, a Riptide with this loadout costs 305 points, an increase of 27 points, just under ten percent.If, a few weeks ago, someone were to have offered me a ten percent increase on my Riptides going into 9th edition, I would’ve snapped their hand off. Tabletop Gaming News, Tactics and Discounted SuppliesSignals from the Frontline #699: Terrain in 9th ed 40kOur First Major Winning List in 9th Ed: Salamanders! Save Codex Blood Pact 8th Edition v1.pdf For Later. The Tiger Shark offers T’au players a 2+ platform with plenty of big guns, all for 416 points. Gun and Marker Drones stayed the same price, which means that, relative to the rest of the game, these two units became This prompts some very interesting choices for the competitive T’au player. Absolutely. For the cost of two Shield Drones, 30 points, we could take three Marker Drones. Would these points best be spent on a model that hits on a 2+ and can’t fall back and shoot? For a look at what the Tiger Shark can do, check out Where does this leave us? Any time spent on a complicated system to update 8th edition points costs to 9th edition would take away from time spent on rules and points costs in the new codex books. GW could have written a simple formula: if the model’s toughness characteristic is 3 and its save characteristic is 5+, increase its points by 20 percent.These figures are entirely arbitrary, but you get the idea.Such a method of increasing points costs would be a blunt instrument.

But more importantly, this change frees up a support system slot. For example, the two variables above apply to both T’au Pathfinders and Aeldari Rangers. There are good arguments to say that combat improved in 9th — the board is smaller, there will be far less overwatch — and there are good arguments to say that combat got worse in 9th — charging units must be able to reach all their targets, tri-pointing is no longer effective — and I’m not sure which side of this debate I come down on.However, the key point is that if the T’au Commander is tagged in combat, he is then all but useless for at least the following turn.With this in mind, on what else could we spend our 300 points?I want to begin with the Ghostkeel.

Tu Y Yo In English, Maxwell Discography Rar, North Lake Tahoe Weather Forecast 20 Day, I've Taken A Ride On A Loon Balloon, How To Clean Barley At Home, Craigcat For Sale In South Carolina, Footlocker Access Denied, Asc 730 Research And Development Pwc, Elk Calves For Sale Texas, Billy Gibbons Death, Muji Oak Bed Frame Review, Don Fernando Colunga, Mastercraft Nxt22 Surf Settings, Funny Fruit Names, Wow Classic Spell Power Enchant, Riddick Movie All Parts In Hindi, Ccne Accreditation Vs Acen, Wilford Brimley Net Worth, First Girl I Loved Full Movie 123movie, Does A Caecilian Have Hair, Crown Of Thorns Flower Language, What Is The Largest Western Diamondback Rattlesnake On Record, Rat Terrier Breeders In Wisconsin, Twin Bed With Storage Plans, Atypical Script Pdf, Tv Drama Pilot Structure, The Unauthorized Saved By The Bell Story Full Movie, Minecraft Days To Real Time Converter, Katherine Cecilia Sambles,